Usually two or three resignations from heads of troubled companies, is not much to balk out, but recently, 6-7 heads of very important financial institutions have resigned. High level resignation is normally reserved for a few situations: those who have made a big mistake, expect a big mistake to be made, or formally, don’t want to deal with a mistake that was made long ago and soon must be faced.

Here are the recent resignations in chronological order:

February 6, 2012: Dhanlaxmi Bank CEO Amitabh Chaturvedi quits:

February 10, 2012: Tamilnad Mercantile Bank MD resigns:

February 13, 2012: Kuwait central bank chief resigns amid political tensions:

February 14, 2012: Nicaragua’s Central Bank President Antenor Rosales quit admist row:

February 15, 2012: Slovenia’s Two Biggest Banks’ CEOs Step Down:

February 15, 2012: World Bank President Zoellick Resigns:

February 16, 2012: CFO of ANZ Bank Resigns Amid Turmoil:

February 16, 2012: Royal Bank of Scotland’s Stephen Williams quits the role:

February 17, 2012: Credit Suisse’s Private Bank Chief Asian Economist Tan Resigns:

That’s 9 resignations in then eleven days, we have not included the other resignations from the likes of the head of the central bank in Switzerland a month ago, and the talk of the head of Goldman Sachs leaving. Why are the heads of very large financial instutitions resigning? Corporate governance experts would say that people resign to make room for new policies, and way of doing things, but this is a peculiar situation of contagion amongst those with key exposure.

The first to see the flame, usually leave the building, maybe this is not the case, nonetheless, such events with obvious patterns should be taken note of.